Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

Economic aspects of coal deposits exploration of the Ulug-Khem basin (Tuva)

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-461847
Open Access
International academic journal «Human and society»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Human and society»
Author:
Lebedev V.I. 1
Work direction:
[22.00.00] Социологические науки
Rating:
Article accesses:
2263
Published in:
doaj
eLibrary.ru
КиберЛенинка
1 Tuvinian Institute for Exploration of Natural Resources of SB RAS
For citation:
Lebedev V. I. (2017). Economic aspects of coal deposits exploration of the Ulug-Khem basin (Tuva). Human and society, 26-30. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-461847

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Reviewing
  • Metrics
UDC 502.3:504.5:662.6/.7

Abstract

In accordance with the article, 11 deposits coal on the territory of Tuva are accounted by State Reserves Register of the Russian Federation, the total profitable reserves are estimated at 1,12 billion tons whereof 936.6 thousand tons are dealt with as coking coals. The vast majority of explored deposits of coals of the republic are concentrated in the Ulugh-Khem basin, the total projected resources of which exceed 20 bill.t. It is substantiated that coking coal of the Ulugh-Khem basin is the most competitive resource of Tyva Republic. Low ash content, excellent caking index, low sulfur and phosphorus in coking coal of ranks GG and GZh indicate their high quality, according to these characteristics GG, GZh coal ranks take precedence over Kuznetsk and Pechora coals. About 70 bill.t of coking coal are annually mined in Russia, but there is a deficit on certain coal ranks. It is primarily related to internal prices increase for coking coal in Russia. According to forecasts of researchers coal deficit will rise up to 15–17 bill.t in the country.

References

  1. 1. Dabiev D.F., Soyan M.K. & Lebedev V.I. Valuation of coal deposits of Tyva Republic / Coal. – 2009. – №10. – P. 50–52.
  2. 2. Dabiev D.F. Valuation of mineral resources development effectiveness in Tyva Republic // ECO. Russian Economic Journal. – №4 – p. 114–122.
  3. 3. Economic evaluation of mineral resources of Karelia / edited by Sh.Sh. Baybusinova. Petrozavodsk. – 2001. – p. 284.
  4. 4. Informational-analytical center «Mineral» [Electronic resource]/ – Access mode: http://www.mineral.ru 29.03.2009.
  5. 5. Lebedev N.I. Coals of Tuva: Status and prospects of mineral resources development / Executive editor. Doctor of Geology and Mineralogy V.I. Lebedev. – Kyzyl: TuvIENR SB RAS, 2007. – P. 180.
  6. 6. Lebedev V.I., Lebedeva M.F., & Lebedev N.I. Mineral resource potential of the Republic of Tyva and prospects of its development / Economic revival of Russia. – 2009. – P. 66–73.
  7. 7. Lebedev N.I. Mineral resources of Tuva: review and analysis of minerals / Executive editor Doct. of Geol. and Miner. V.I. Lebedev. – Kyzyl: TuvIENR SB RAS, 2012. – P. 284.
  8. 8. Russian coal base. / V. III: Coal basins and deposits of Eastern Siberia (Krasnoyarsk region, Kansk-Achinsk basins; Republic of Khakasia, Minusinsk basin, Republic of Tyva. Ulughkhem basin and other deposits; Irkutsk basin, and coal deposits of Baikal region) – Moscow: «Geoinformtsentr», 2002. – P. 488.
  9. 9. Spatial aspect of socio-economic development of the region / Edited by A.S. Novosyelov. – Novosibirsk: IEIE SB RAS, 2006. – P. 138.
  10. 10. The development strategy of the Russian coal industry in the first decade of the XXI century / A.E. Kontorovich, V.V. Kuleshov etc. – Novosibirsk: Publishing House of SB RAS, Inst. «Geo», 2000. – P. 55.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.